Roadmap proposal for 3.10/4.0
me at zulq.net
Sun Oct 15 22:06:18 UTC 2006
Isn't the list that Stef is starting the same list you propose be
produced after the first two months?
Don't get me wrong, a plan is a good thing to have I'm just trying to
understand how you wont end up with a big list that will give you the
Andreas Raab wrote:
> I don't know what other people think, but these long feature lists just
> give me the shivers. What if instead of listing feature X, Y, and Z (on
> many of which the implementation hasn't even started) we simply have a
> schedule that says:
> a) Open discussion: Two months of determining what's ready to go into
> the next release. At the end of the that period there should be a list
> of things that we'd like to have in the next release.
More information about the Squeak-dev