2007-01-17 SqF board notes
Bert Freudenberg
bert at freudenbergs.de
Thu Jan 25 16:50:00 UTC 2007
Stef,
I forwarded your request to the board.
This report is about the meeting on the 17th, you sent the mail on
the 21st. Due to general shortage of time-machines around here I
didn't send it in time for the last meeting. ;-)
Next meeting will be first Wednesday of February, which is the 7th.
I'll be on vacation at that time, but as I wrote, I forwarded it, and
the other guys can deal with it accordingly.
- Bert -
On Jan 25, 2007, at 16:29 , stephane ducasse wrote:
> Hi board members,
>
> I have sent an email related to Bert but apparently he did not
> mention it.
>
> So this is a point for your next discussion:
> - how can we consolidate the effort of the relicensing?
> Will we accept code in 3.10 by people that did not sign the MIT
> agreement? I hope not.
> How can the release team access this information? Do we have a
> list available?
> How a squeaker can sign such an agreement if he was not originally
> contacted?
> A suggestion for ViewPoint: I would be nice to be able to have
> scanned copies
> of the licenses somewhere on the foundation server too.
>
>
> Stef
>
> On 25 janv. 07, at 01:47, Craig Latta wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi all--
>>
>> The Squeak Foundation board meets online for one hour on the
>> first
>> and third Wednesday of each month. Thanks again to those of you
>> who have
>> submitted agenda item suggestions[1]. Please keep them coming!
>>
>> At the 2007-01-17 meeting, Bert, Craig, Marcus, Tim, and Yoshiki
>> attended; Cees was absent. The meeting had seven agenda items.
>>
>> 1. Review previous action items.
>>
>> There was one action item from the previous meeting.
>>
>> 1.1. Craig will continue the incorporation process.
>>
>> The first big decision we need to make is our state of
>> incorporation in the United States. Under US IRS requirements we
>> need to have a legal physical presence in that state.
>> Practically,
>> this means we can either use a state in which one of us live, or
>> pay a third party to maintain that presence for us (typically
>> Delaware). I'm the only one on the current board who even
>> lives in
>> the US, and I live in California. Given the expense and possible
>> complication of hiring a third party, the likelihood of future
>> Squeak Foundation board members from California, and the fact
>> that
>> Viewpoints Research Institute is there as well, we decided to
>> incorporate in California.
>>
>> Stay tuned.
>>
>> 2. Discuss pricing of Squeak badges and other fundraising details.
>>
>> Tim awaits an official fresh quote from the badge
>> manufacturer. In
>> the meantime, he will set up a group of people from the community to
>> help with order fulfillment (storage, payment, and shipping). We
>> decided
>> that using a third party for that was financially prohibitive
>> given the
>> cost of goods. We currently anticipate a cost of USD 1.80 per badge,
>> offered with USD 5 "general" donations (for a silver badge) and
>> USD 50
>> "gold" donations (for a gold badge).
>>
>> Marcus will retire the old donations web presence, along with
>> the
>> rest of the old Squeak Foundation site, and create a new one.
>>
>> We don't anticipate that fundraising activity will reach full
>> speed
>> until we've incorporated and gained tax-exempt status.
>>
>> 3. Cees will report on the state of the Squeak wiki (apparently,
>> at least as of 2007-01-11, it has been successfully moved from
>> Georgia Tech to wiki.squeak.org).
>>
>> Cees wasn't present, but it does seem that the move was
>> successful.
>>
>> 4. Consider Chris Cunnington's proposal for a public relations
>> team.
>>
>> The board was unanimous: go for it, Chris!
>>
>> 5. Start the next election process.
>>
>> Yoshiki, as board liaison to the Elections team, will ask
>> Daniel to
>> get things going.
>>
>> 6. List the current action items.
>>
>> 6.1. Craig will continue the incorporation process.
>>
>> 6.2. Tim will report the official badges quote and create a
>> badges
>> fulfillment team.
>>
>> 6.3. Marcus will retire the old Squeak Foundation site, and
>> create
>> a new one (or at least an up-to-date way to donate to the
>> Foundation).
>>
>> 7. List the next meeting's agenda items.
>>
>> 7.1. Review previous action items.
>>
>> 7.2. Craig will report on code contributor response to VPRI's
>> relicensing message. (Notices have been sent to all known
>> contributors[2]. If you've received a notice, please
>> respond
>> as per its instructions, if you haven't already. If we
>> missed
>> you, please let me know.)
>>
>>
>> thanks again,
>>
>> -C
>>
>> [1] http://people.squeakfoundation.org/article/64.html
>> [2] http://netjam.org/squeak/contributors
>>
>> --
>> Craig Latta
>> http://netjam.org/resume
>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|