On Thu, 17 May 2007 16:45:51 +0200, subbukk wrote:

> On Thursday 17 May 2007 6:55 pm, Ralph Johnson wrote:
>> The main reason why most project on SqueakSource don't have a decent
>> project description is because most people are lazy.
> A rule isn't a rule unless it is enforced!
>
> How about rejecting project submissions unless they come with atleast 20  
> words in their description?

This is an abstract. This is an abstract. This is an abstract. This is an  
abstract. This is an abstract.

> Surely, creating a 20-word abstract shouldn't be too
> much of a burden for someone who has put in so much effort into a  
> project.

The burden is on the reviewer and the policy makers: what to do when 20  
words do not happen or sort of the above example happens.

If you want visitors to get valuable information on first visit, then you  
need a process (and a policy) which ensures a) information and b) valuable.

/Klaus

> Regards .. Subbu
>
>