On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:01:02 +0200, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> El 4/11/08 8:28 AM, "Klaus D. Witzel" escribió:
>
>> [I'm just adding an item, not related to the issues mentioned earlier in
>> this thread]
>>
>> What happens to the Mantis reports which are addressed/solved by the
>> release process?
>>
>> Must they be marked as closed, others as postphoned, or even as "not
>> considered by 3.10" etc?
>>
>> Just a thought, worth to be mentioned under this thread's subject, IMHO.
>>
>> /Klaus
>
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5975 "History of the 3.10 release"
>
> In image I put a History morph, for people could have a glimpse of how
> release evolved from as old as History7124.morph from 20/07/07.
>
> Most items was marked as resolved, as was discussed in release list if my
> memory don't fail me.

The wiki page mentions http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6336 which is  
still open on Mantis. I confirm I can see the patch at work in Damien's  
3.10 based Squeak-dev .images.

Do you want me to check http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5975 against Mantis?

/Klaus

> Some could have feedback and was reopened or marked different
>
> More 3.10 docs in http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5919 The 3.10 release
>
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5934 List of Mantis issues ready to be
> included in 3.10 (not all here go to release for different reasons)
>
> http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5990 Complaints about how 3.10 is going
> Here I could say "Ahora es tarde para lagrimas" :=) (too late for tears  
> !)
>
> Edgar
>
> P.S. I just complete some of OS info in ftp directories as requested and
> with the info I have until now.
>