On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 16:42 -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> 
> 
> El 2/8/08 3:28 PM, "Ken Causey" <ken at kencausey.com> escribió:
> 
> > Use of Mantis was really only meant to be temporary and I had
> > thought that by now we would have decided on another tool that would be
> > at least a better fit than any, including Mantis, that had come before.
> > Hope is on the horizon at least in the form of Gjallar and Delta Stream
> > and in work I believe is swimming around in the mind, at least, of Craig
> > Latta.
> 
> I have deep respect for Craig, Goran, Matthew and others working on this.
> 
> But...
> 
> If still people don't put bug reports in Mantis and few use it (from many
> Squeakers), how you think they instantly use still unknown ?
> 
> Blaming Mantis don't help. It's useful.
> 
> 
> Edgar

I'm not blaming Mantis.  From day one it was little more than a stopgap
measure.  That being said, the fact that use of it has not been taken up
more generally is surely evidence that it is not a natural fit.

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20080208/222362eb/attachment.pgp