[squeak-dev] Re: Swazoo - LGPL or MIT?

Jason Johnson jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 22 06:03:47 UTC 2008


On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Bruce Badger <bwbadger at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/03/2008, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek at eranova.si> wrote:
>  > Well, Swazoo license is still not seriously defined IMO
>
>  You can't change the license by just announcing that you have.
>
>  If you manage to persuade the people who contributed to Swazoo to
>  switch the license, then fair enough.  Until then, Swazoo is 100%
>  under the LGPL, no ifs no buts no doubt.

This is exactly the kind of situation Squeak needs to stay far away
from.  How much infected code are we talking about here?  Personally I
was considering going with Swazoo for some business websites I'm
doing, but this answers that question for me.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list