[squeak-dev] Re: what is holding back Smalltalk?
Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn at stonehenge.com
Fri Nov 21 14:07:16 UTC 2008
>>>>> "Janko" == Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek at eranova.si> writes:
Janko> Please excuse me but I need to support Paolo here. In sense that he
Janko> doesn't stick blindfuly to those license issues while you do. Again and
Janko> again. Please stop dividing Smalltalk world with such actions. Squeak
Janko> is/will be MIT, GNU Smalltalk is LGPL. OK, that is, don't expose your
Janko> anti-whatever license bias again and again. For the Smalltalk as a
Janko> whole sake. Please.
Please stop mischaracterising this as a license "bias" or telling me to not
perform my duty to ensure a clean license for Squeak. I truly do not want
disharmony on this issue. But the lawyers (especially for the FSF) would
differ on that, and that would be a serious mess. Best to do the right thing
now, and not have to face a meltdown later.
The Squeak community chose Apache2. The GST authors chose GPL/LGPL. I
support both of those choices completely. But it means that while code could
freely flow from Squeak to GST, the opposite is *an unknown needless risk*.
That's all i've ever argued on this. And any comment to the contrary deserves
my clarification again.
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
More information about the Squeak-dev