[squeak-dev] Re: OSProcess left-over pipe handles?

Udo Schneider Udo.Schneider at homeaddress.de
Sat Dec 12 23:29:13 UTC 2009

Hi David

> If you are using PipeableOSProcess class>>command:, then the most
> You might consider using ProxyPipeline class>>command: rather than
> PipeableOSProcess class>>command. In that case you can use #upToEndOfFile
In which package are PipeableOSProcess and ProxyPipeline define? I can't 
find them in my image with OSProcess-dtl.53 loaded.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list