[squeak-dev] Re: OSProcess left-over pipe handles?

David T. Lewis lewis at mail.msen.com
Sun Dec 13 02:34:21 UTC 2009

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:29:13AM +0100, Udo Schneider wrote:
> Hi David
> >If you are using PipeableOSProcess class>>command:, then the most
> [..]
> >You might consider using ProxyPipeline class>>command: rather than
> >PipeableOSProcess class>>command. In that case you can use #upToEndOfFile
> In which package are PipeableOSProcess and ProxyPipeline define? I can't 
> find them in my image with OSProcess-dtl.53 loaded.

Hi Udo,

These are in CommandShell at http://squeaksource.com/CommandShell.
A description is at http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/1914. Originally
this was part of the OSProcess package, but I split CommandShell
into a separate package when OSProcess got too large.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list