[squeak-dev] Seaside support in Squeak (Re: My Own Squeak
Direction)
Colin Putney
cputney at wiresong.ca
Tue Nov 17 04:50:42 UTC 2009
On 16-Nov-09, at 5:46 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> From a practical perspective, I feel quite comfortable with saying
> that Seaside support is a priority to the point that it might be
> driving issues like String/Symbol comparisons, underscores in
> selectors etc. If Cincom, Dolphin, GST, Gemstone and VA support a
> particular feature in Seaside in a particular way, I think we should
> consider it as well.
Another practical compatibility issue is literal syntax for
ByteArrays. Just about all the other Smalltalks have it, including
Pharo. I ran into this while trying to update OmniBrowser to the
latest Refactoring code. Any objections to implementing it?
Colin
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|