On 12/14/2010 6:06 AM, Matthew Fulmer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:17:14AM -0800, Andreas Raab wrote:
>> On 12/13/2010 9:07 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>>> True. We could also have a class var indicating whether to use signaling
>>> vs. non-signaling NaNs. Virtually no code will care and but if it does
>>> you can flip the switch for compatibility.
>>
>> I've posted a version of this into the inbox for people to look at. I
>> think it's actually a quite reasonable tradeoff; let me know what you think.
>
> I noticed you deleted the infinity check for cos but not for
> sin.

Copy&Paste error (too much code selected :-)

Cheers,
   - Andreas