Levente Uzonyi wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Andreas Raab wrote:
>> I think I'll leave that decision to you, you seem to have a good 
>> handle on this part of the system. FWIW, I had implemented option #2 
>> for our SqueakSource installation realizing that it would be robust 
>> even if we decided to leave out the CRs from the diff.
> 
> With the latest TextDiffBuilder changes everything should work fine with 
> all versions of SqueakSource. #buildTextPatch is SqueakSource's 
> extension method, changing that would break backwards compatibility.

Yup, agreed. It was a quick localized fix for our installation. I didn't 
feel like messing around with TextDiffBuilder itself - making the change 
in the one extension method felt safer for our purposes. Thanks for 
fixing the issue at the root!

Cheers,
   - Andreas