On 9/10/2010 6:26 PM, Florin Mateoc wrote:
> What!? You don't like my meaning-conveying open1 ? :)

He, he :-)

> Seriously now, I don't have a strong opinion either way, but I do have a slight reservation. The 'debugger' part of the
> name is more the 'what for' than the 'what' of what we are doing. There could be other clients that want to use the same
> thing: in VW there is SyntaxError, which is not quite a debugger. Furthermore, from the point of view of an MVC
> developer there is already a known protocol 'open', which the toolBuilder implements, as well as a protocol
> openNoTerminate. Now granted, for the Morphic developer this is not as intuitive.

Well, we could do openNoTerminate but I find it just a little opaque. 
But I'm good with either one; your's and David's call, just let me know 
which way you prefer.

Cheers,
   - Andreas