On 9/10/2010 11:08 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 6:26 PM, Florin Mateoc wrote:
>> What!? You don't like my meaning-conveying open1 ? :)
>
> He, he :-)
>
>> Seriously now, I don't have a strong opinion either way, but I do have a slight reservation. The 'debugger' part of the
>> name is more the 'what for' than the 'what' of what we are doing. There could be other clients that want to use the same
>> thing: in VW there is SyntaxError, which is not quite a debugger. Furthermore, from the point of view of an MVC
>> developer there is already a known protocol 'open', which the toolBuilder implements, as well as a protocol
>> openNoTerminate. Now granted, for the Morphic developer this is not as intuitive.
>
> Well, we could do openNoTerminate but I find it just a little opaque. But I'm good with either one; your's and David's
> call, just let me know which way you prefer.
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
>

As I said, I also don't have a strong opinion, so it's up to Dave

Florin