Hannes Hirzel wrote:
> I agree. Does this imply that two all-in-one packages are needed, a
> Cog and an non-cog?
>
> --Hannes
>
> On 4/28/11, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>   
>> Since this isn't the first time people do benchmarks, but don't download
>> VMs independently, therefore I think we have to package VMs with the
>> releases in the future. IIRC someone even concluded that Pharo is faster
>> than Squeak, but he just used what he got from the website (Cog for Pharo
>> and the interpreter vm for Squeak).
>>
>>
>> Levente
Is the difference between a Cog and non-Cog VM just the a different exe 
(for windows)?
How compatible are the images for Cog and non-Cog? 
Could two executables be included in a single All-In-One package - ie 
named like SqueakClassic.exe & SqueakCog.exe ?