To have Squeak with Cog I replaced the old Squeak VM with a Cog one
from http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/ (MSWindows)

--Hannes

On 4/29/11, Ben Coman <btc at openinworld.com> wrote:
> Hannes Hirzel wrote:
>> I agree. Does this imply that two all-in-one packages are needed, a
>> Cog and an non-cog?
>>
>> --Hannes
>>
>> On 4/28/11, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
>>
>>> Since this isn't the first time people do benchmarks, but don't download
>>> VMs independently, therefore I think we have to package VMs with the
>>> releases in the future. IIRC someone even concluded that Pharo is faster
>>> than Squeak, but he just used what he got from the website (Cog for Pharo
>>> and the interpreter vm for Squeak).
>>>
>>>
>>> Levente
> Is the difference between a Cog and non-Cog VM just the a different exe
> (for windows)?
> How compatible are the images for Cog and non-Cog?
> Could two executables be included in a single All-In-One package - ie
> named like SqueakClassic.exe & SqueakCog.exe ?
>
>