You already cited Craig.
You could also explore http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Namespaces
You could see how other dialects did (VW, gst, stx, ...)
You could read about Newspeak proposals.

Nicolas

2011/5/9 Göran Krampe <goran at krampe.se>:
> On 05/08/2011 11:45 PM, Casey Ransberger wrote:
>>
>> Hey Craig,
>>
>> Sounds really interesting. FWIW I like "named" namespaces because they
>> make searching a codebase for dependencies easier. At the end of the
>> day, one ends up with far less namespaces than one has classes, and in
>> my own experience, that's a lot more manageable than what we have now.
>>
>> That said, I'll try anything once. I've seen a *wealth* of *great* ideas
>> about how to do namespaces in Squeak... but I've only seen one working
>> implementation, which is at present irksomely dependent on OmniBrowser
>
> Well, then you haven't seen mine that was implemented way back in... 2004:
>
>        http://map.squeak.org/packagebyname/namespaces
>
> ...and I presume you didn't search SM for "Namespaces" or google it?
>
> Read more here:
>
>        http://swiki.krampe.se/gohu/27
>
> ...especially the "Prefixes Improved" article.
>
> regards, Göran
>
> PS. IMHO my solution is still really elegant compared to other proposals I
> have seen. And with a bit more work it could easily do thing like remappings
> of Namespaces etc - although since it is based on static bindings (just like
> now) that would require "recompilation" but that doesn't feel like such a
> big deal given those usecases.
>
>