On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:29:29PM -0500, Chris Muller wrote:
> Just an FYI, the Magma test suite is pretty heavy on networking
> activity, but I didn't encounter any problems with this loaded.
> 
> So what needs to happen for us as a community to make a decision on
> whether to accept or reject this?  I assume we will accept it, but
> maybe some of those more familiar with it can make some comments..?
> Who is our best networking expert who might want to review it and
> discuss?

I have merged Levente's Network-ul.100 updates into the current Squeak
trunk, and made some additional changes to get unit tests working.

The updates are in the inbox in Network-dtl.123 and NetworkTests-dtl.28.
I would appreciate if a couple of folks could load these updates,
run the network tests, and let us know if any problems arise.

If there are no objections after a few days, I'll move the updates
to trunk and we can sort out any remaining issues there.

Dave

> 
>  - Chris
> 
> 
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
> > A new version of Network was added to project The Inbox:
> > http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Network-ul.100.mcz
> >
> > ==================== Summary ====================
> >
> > Name: Network-ul.100
> > Author: ul
> > Time: 12 December 2010, 4:49:19.894 am
> > UUID: 81823263-c3d6-f949-a8b0-6a107dcb5322
> > Ancestors: Network-ul.99
> >
> > Network changes from the EToys repository.
> >
> > =============== Diff against Network-ul.99 ===============

<snip>