On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:


> Yes.  I've always liked how everything we do in Smalltalk is built on
> an aggregation of just 3 or 4 concepts, and that's it.  THAT is pretty
> slick in itself.
>

Agreed.

I suppose the appropriate term for the Smalltalk community would be
"domain-specific vocabulary." We don't create a a separate language, with
its own syntax and grammar, but we do tend to create to create a coherent
system of nouns and verbs (classes and messages) that draw directly from
the problem domain. Let's all write slick DSVs!

Colin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140106/c6452323/attachment.htm