On 27.01.2014, at 12:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan at stack.nl> wrote:

> Chris wrote:
>> Each of my own application instances has its own SharedObjects 
>> container.  It's just a simple wrapper of some IdentityDictionary's, 
>> one for Dates, one for literals (incl. Strings).  This way, each 
>> object belongs in its own persistent domain, and remaining a String to 
>> avoid being forced to be shared across persistent domains. 
>> 
>> We should not let any one app bloat the SymbolTable (which can slow 
>> down the system for ALL apps) merely for this purpose.  If we want to 
>> address this data redundancy, we should do so explicitly in the app 
>> (MC).  This is a recurring issue we should address it with a reusable 
>> first-class SharedObjectsContainer (or something else acceptable). 
> 
> Ha, that’s the kind of comments I was hoping for. Thanks Tobias for 
> pushing this. An application specific value object cache makes sense.
> 
> Stephan
> 
> 

May we schedule this for 4.6?

Best
	-Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1665 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20140127/af96c3a8/signature.pgp