[squeak-dev] Re: The Inbox: Monticello-topa.585.mcz
Stephan Eggermont
stephan at stack.nl
Mon Jan 27 11:06:09 UTC 2014
Chris wrote:
>Each of my own application instances has its own SharedObjects
>container. It's just a simple wrapper of some IdentityDictionary's,
>one for Dates, one for literals (incl. Strings). This way, each
>object belongs in its own persistent domain, and remaining a String to
>avoid being forced to be shared across persistent domains.
>
>We should not let any one app bloat the SymbolTable (which can slow
>down the system for ALL apps) merely for this purpose. If we want to
>address this data redundancy, we should do so explicitly in the app
>(MC). This is a recurring issue we should address it with a reusable
>first-class SharedObjectsContainer (or something else acceptable).
Ha, that’s the kind of comments I was hoping for. Thanks Tobias for
pushing this. An application specific value object cache makes sense.
Stephan
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|