Great.
Seems we need to issue a update map before these gets pulled in by updating.

Can also remove Universes package ?
That also needs to be done in a update map, I think

Karl

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 14.04.2015, at 14:18, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We should pull these in to trunk as soon as possible so we can get stuff
> tested before the release of a new image.
> >
> > Can you do that Levente, as you seem most familiar with the changes you
> made ?
> >
>
> Although I am not levente I went ahead and pushed SqueakSSL and WebClient
> into
> the trunk. Lets see how it turns out.
>
> Best
>         -Tobias
>
> > Karl
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Levente
> >
> > On 06.04.2015, at 20:43, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > It would be better for these packages too, because they would get more
> > > attention.
> > > The SqueakSSL/WebClient changes I made in October[1] are still missing
> from the official repositories.
> > >
> > > Levente
> > >
> > > [1]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-October/180251.html
> > >
> >
> > I just now saw that there is more than just vm stuff.
> >
> > The problem with WebClient and SqueakSSL as of now is, that
> > its maintenance-ship is, well, complicated. I went forth and
> > pushed tiny changes to WebClient by just being somewhat on
> > my own initiative[1].
> >
> > ===========
> >
> > Dear Squeak Community as a whole and dear Ron as person possibly
> > best fit to make a decision on this:
> >
> >         Should we put the maintainer-ship of WebClient and
> >         SqueakSSL into the hands of the Squeak Core Team?
> >
> >
> > ===========
> >
> > Best
> >         -Tobias
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]: There's a saying, initiative is discipline-lessness with positive
> outcome
> >
> > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> On 06.04.2015, at 18:59, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Marcel Taeumel
> > >>>> <marcel.taeumel at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:
> > >>>>> Hey! :)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Can we add both to the update map (somehow?) and see if it works
> out
> > >>>>> during
> > >>>>> the following days/weeks until the release?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> What is the point of moving these into the base image? Aren't these
> > >>> exactly the kinds of things that you would want to have maintained as
> > >>> independent packages that can be easily loaded from SqueakMap?
> > >>
> > >> I think both these are Extremely Important (capital).
> > >> WebClient as replacement for HTTPSocket (it already provides a
> compatibility
> > >> layer; Andreas seemed to always considered WebClient to replace
> HTTPSocket),
> > >> and SqueakSSL because you can't load anything meaningful on the web
> without
> > >> SSL; github, twitter, most sites. And that's good.
> > >> Plus we _finally_ could put the Plain Text Passwords for Monticello
> behind
> > >> SSL…
> > >>
> > >> Best
> > >>      -Tobias
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20150421/a1e1da80/attachment.htm