Read-only source files (was: Re: [squeak-dev] Why is source code always in files only?)

Nicolas Cellier nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 00:29:23 UTC 2015


2015-01-21 1:25 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Cellier <
nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>:

>
>
> 2015-01-21 1:12 GMT+01:00 tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org>:
>
>>
>> On 20-01-2015, at 3:01 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I couldn't find out what the exact case was, but some tools (e.g.
>> Slint) use background processes to examine a set of classes and their
>> methods.
>>
>>
>> Doesn’t Shout read the sources when colouring them?
>>
>>
> Bingo!
>  styler styleInBackgroundProcess: textMorph contents
>
>
Oops, answered too fast, textMorph contents indicates that the source were
already fetched in foreground process...


> Since the position of a ReadWriteStream is for both reading and writing,
> the read and write are going to fight each other...
> In which case a read-append-stream would be superior, it would not write
> to the read-position, but allways append...
>
> ReadWriteStream really is a complex beast.
>
>
>> tim
>> --
>> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> "Bother!" said Pooh, searching for the $10m winning lottery ticket.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20150121/930311af/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list