Busted ;-)

Dave


> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:13 PM David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> The test is not intended to advocate for or against caching #getSeconds.
>> It provides coverage for expected behavior. So if you did decide to
>> cache
>> #getSeconds, then you would still want this test to pass.
>
> I was referring to your your reference from the other thread:
> ____
> "I also added a test (Chronology-Tests-dtl.15 in the inbox) that
> illustrates
> the hazards of caching the getSeconds value."
> ____
>
> ...which easily reads as opposition to the idea of caching it.
>
> Best,
>   Chris
>
>