[Squeakfoundation]re: Basic tenets of what goes in the image

[Daniel Vainsencher]

What you say is true, but very reasonable people may wildly disagree on
what that statement means, and I'm trying to eliminate precisely that
effect... :-)

Daniel
PS -
Taking the simplifying direction a step further, my day-job team has an
expression that seems relevant - "Make Good" ;-)

Craig Latta <craig.latta@netjam.org> wrote:
> 
> > This is my proposed base policy on what should go into the image...
> 
> 	That all sounds reasonable. If we want to make policy, I think I would
> (somewhat loosely) state it as simply "the released image should contain
> things for which omission would cause confusion or inconvenience to a
> new user". Note that, as our distribution technology changes (and we get
> things like utterly-minimal images, pervasive network installation,
> unloading, etc.), the implications of that statement will evolve.
> 
> 
> -C
> 
> --
> Craig Latta
> improvisational musical informaticist
> craig@netjam.org
> www.netjam.org/resume
> Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation