[Squeakfoundation]re: Flow integration
Craig Latta
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Fri, 22 Nov 2002 01:10:44 -0800
Hi Avi--
> It sounds like you're saying "because if I change the names, it
> forces people to make sure their stuff works with Flow".
That's not what I'm saying, nor what I think the reality is.
> Personally, I'd love to use it, but it's not gonna happen (or not anytime
> soon) if it means porting all my existing code to it.
It doesn't. As I've said, it means temporarily using a few different
class names.
> On the other hand, if Flow can live happily side by side with the
> current streams, and I can, *without* any porting effort, have new
> code that uses Flow in the same image as old code that doesn't...
That is the case. :)
> ...I'm likely to actually use Flow - and it's only by getting used
> that Flow will get tested at all.
Yup.
thanks,
-C
--
Craig Latta
improvisational musical informaticist
craig@netjam.org
www.netjam.org/resume
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]