[squeakland] [etoys-dev] sixteen items for Squeakland 2012 - item 7: Single step debugger

[Steve Thomas]

Okay, so I realize this is not a simple request, but ...
Can we have a Step Backward in addition to Step forward?

Like in the Online Python
Tutor<http://people.csail.mit.edu/pgbovine/python/> (which
is really cool in helping make the invisible visible and giving kids an
idea of what is going on inside the computer).

Stephen



On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Ricardo Moran <richi.moran at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Scott Wallace <
>> scott.wallace at squeakland.org> wrote:
>>
>>> 7. Single Step Debugger
>>
>>
>> Hi, I made a new picture for the step button in the script editors. A new
>> project is attached for you to test and review.
>>
>> The new button looks like this:
>> [image: StepMe.png]
>>
>> and the old one:
>> [image: StepMe (bug).png]
>>
>> Of course, it's up to you to decide which form to use (or propose a new
>> one).
>> I don't really care much for the button's form anyway, but I'm *very*
>> interested in the "stepping" feature.
>>
>
> New button is nice. but it must have a little bigger gap between the
> triangle and the line.
> See scaled screen cap where the two elements blend together.
>
> But we also have the ! button. And the Step button in the AllScriptsTool
>
> Should we add a new button for single stepping or should we repurpose a
> old button ?
>
> Karl
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> squeakland mailing list
> squeakland at squeakland.org
> http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/squeakland
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakland.org/pipermail/squeakland/attachments/20120131/a85f53b7/attachment.html>