[UI] We haven't discussed Host windows yet

[Gary Chambers]

Well, that gives us something to base a way forward upon.
We need to really flesh out what people really want before going any
further, I think.

A big change but, perhaps we could make morphic the legacy framework via
wrappers in a new approach, taking things like host integration into account
(as opposed to the other way around at present).

Just a thought.

-----Original Message-----
From: ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of tim Rowledge
Sent: 06 September 2007 3:56 pm
To: Squeak's User Interface
Subject: Re: [UI] We haven't discussed Host windows yet



On 6-Sep-07, at 3:31 AM, Herbert König wrote:


>
> 2-Not every application needs full window decorations (maximize, 
> minimize, close).
>
> IMO these call for host windows. Not as a matter of look (I'd prefer
> Morphic) but as a matter of feel. The third point needs an extension 
> to the HostWindows plugin, maybe this is not possible to do 
> independent of the platform.
The mechanism is already there - http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3862 -  
it simply needs extending to actual concrete cases.

tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim "Today's
subliminal thought is:"


_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui