[UI] We haven't discussed Host windows yet
gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com
Thu Sep 6 15:03:28 UTC 2007
Well, that gives us something to base a way forward upon.
We need to really flesh out what people really want before going any
further, I think.
A big change but, perhaps we could make morphic the legacy framework via
wrappers in a new approach, taking things like host integration into account
(as opposed to the other way around at present).
Just a thought.
From: ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of tim Rowledge
Sent: 06 September 2007 3:56 pm
To: Squeak's User Interface
Subject: Re: [UI] We haven't discussed Host windows yet
On 6-Sep-07, at 3:31 AM, Herbert König wrote:
> 2-Not every application needs full window decorations (maximize,
> minimize, close).
> IMO these call for host windows. Not as a matter of look (I'd prefer
> Morphic) but as a matter of feel. The third point needs an extension
> to the HostWindows plugin, maybe this is not possible to do
> independent of the platform.
The mechanism is already there - http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3862 -
it simply needs extending to actual concrete cases.
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim "Today's
subliminal thought is:"
UI mailing list
UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the UI