[V3dot10] Re: 3.10

[Marcus Denker]

On 14.12.2006, at 15:35, Keith Hodges wrote:

> Marcus Denker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it would be important to keep the Testing framework in a  
>> different package then the image tests themselves.
>>
> So at present
>
> SUnit the package contains SUnit-Tests (i.e. as a user I want to  
> discard or not load the tests)
>

No, SUnit is the package containing the SUnit Framework. SUnitGUI  
contains the testrunner.
The tests are in other packages... there is Tests, which has some  
(e.g. VM tests, primitive tests)
and then for each package has a test package (e.g MorphicTests) or  
the tests are inside
the package (e.g. Files-Tests).

> All I was doing was separating the two into
>
> Testing
> Testing Tests
>
> AND providing a slot for common code between Testing frameworks.
>
> Testing-Common
>
> With this scheme the SUnit package contains
>
> Testing-SUnit-Kernel
> Testing-SUnit-Extensions
> Testing Tests-SUnit
> Testing-Common-UI
>
> this seemed logical enough to me!
>
> Loading SSpec would load additional packages into this tree.
>
> Testing-SSPec
> Testing Tests-SSpec
>
> Keith
>
>> I have to admit I like the idea that SUnit is it's own package,  
>> it's even on SqueakSource right now, with just a copy
>> of that main source in 3.9...
>>
>>    Marcus
> Send instant messages to your online friends http:// 
> uk.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________
> V3dot10 mailing list
> V3dot10 at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10