[V3dot10] [ab] Why ruby?

[stephane ducasse]

I would write a separate library because else this will take ages to  
get introduced.
I think that for a process point of view it is better to have a  
separate package working well
and once it is there we slowly cut and plug the core using the packages.
This way lowers the stress on everybody (users of the actual lib and  
harvesters).

Stef


On 13 févr. 07, at 22:22, Keith Hodges wrote:

> Todd Blanchard wrote:
>> We've been kicking around the idea of adopting FLOW.  I'd rather  
>> look into that than write something new.
>>
>> -Todd Blanchard
>>
> Definitely a good idea, and I think that many of the  Rio ideas  
> would sit nicely on top of flow.
>
> So we need to be looking at a process to plan this happening, i.e  
> when to deprecate classes, when to have new stuff ready. Of course  
> 3.10 is not planning to implement anything radically new until  
> there is some more of the process in place, but we can dream cant we!
>
> http://squeak310.pbwiki.com/From310To311
> http://squeak310.pbwiki.com/From39To310
>
>
>
> Keith
>
>
>
> 		
> ___________________________________________________________ All New  
> Yahoo! Mail – Tired of Vi at gr@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect  
> you. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
> _______________________________________________
> V3dot10 mailing list
> V3dot10 at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
>