[V3dot10] [ab] Why ruby?

[stephane ducasse]

> We've been kicking around the idea of adopting FLOW.  I'd rather  
> look into that than write something new.

I looked at it but I dont remember. It is working and good enough to  
change.
I remember a lot of discussion since we could not load FLOW and have  
the old stream available.
This really slowed down the adoption of FLOW and I was sad.

Stef
>
> -Todd Blanchard
>
> On Feb 13, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
>
>> Keith Hodges a écrit :
>>> I did, and I like the idea, we built a similar thing called path  
>>> for ruby about 6 years ago.
>>> But look at rio, it takes this to another level. It treats files  
>>> in a remote ftp directory, or http the same as local ones. It  
>>> handles give me all the files in the directory tree  on this  
>>> remote site searching directories recursively matching this  
>>> pattern and move them into my local directory all in one line.
>>> Lets bite the bullet and build something without FileDirectory  
>>> underneath it.
>>
>> If you want to do it, I can help.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Damien Cassou
>> _______________________________________________
>> V3dot10 mailing list
>> V3dot10 at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
>
> _______________________________________________
> V3dot10 mailing list
> V3dot10 at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
>