[V3dot10] Re: Flow
tapplek at gmail.com
Sat Feb 17 23:16:58 UTC 2007
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 04:09:24PM +0100, stephane ducasse wrote:
> >We've been kicking around the idea of adopting FLOW. I'd rather
> >look into that than write something new.
> I looked at it but I dont remember. It is working and good enough to
> I remember a lot of discussion since we could not load FLOW and have
> the old stream available.
> This really slowed down the adoption of FLOW and I was sad.
That may have been true in the past, but the most recent
developments in flow  indicate that it is independent of
Streams, and has been moved into its own namespace, so Flow
should play nicely with Streams. However, this code is not yet
released, and is up to six months old.
Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/
Help improve Squeak Documentation: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808
More information about the V3dot10