[V3dot10] Other comments regarding 3.10.1gamma progress

[Ken Causey]

On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 16:56 -0300, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
> 
> 
> El 5/12/08 3:32 PM, "Ken Causey" <ken at kencausey.com> escribió:
> 
> > Edgar,
> > 
> > Admittedly I was not really part of the 3.10 development but I thought I
> > had an idea of how it was to be done and I can see some evidence of it
> > now in terms of the update stream, source.sqf.org repository, Mantis
> > reports.
> > 
> > Have you given up on ReleaseBuilder and using source.sqf.org?  I see
> > that your most recent updates are in the update stream in the old style.
> 
> Well I think all agree we use .cs, but if not ...

It seems to me that when a release team has a policy and has followed it
for the bulk of the process, then changing it for the minor releases is
not the best idea.  And especially changing it unilaterally and without
any notice.

> > You are issuing updates for notes that Jerome added to #7035 but not
> > splitting them out to seperate Mantis issues where more detail and
> > progress can be recorded.  This really makes a mess later when we need
> > to try to track down something.
> 
> The cases I took have a solution. In each you could read some like See
> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6897, where the original report was.

OK, that's not completely unreasonable.  Yet 6897 has not been updated
either to reflect that it has been harvested/updated.

Ken

> 
> Sure, at some time some should be add to original report and to 7035.
> Still I don't have time to do...
>  
> > Ken

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/v3dot10/attachments/20080512/87f3692f/attachment.pgp