'dirty' Etoys package in 6704?

[Adrian Lienhard]

On Dec 8, 2005, at 20:19 , Adrian Lienhard wrote:

>
> Probably it means that some other package removed/changed methods  
> in EToys package

sorry, to be precise, another possibility obviously is that they have  
been moved into another package

> , but an up to date version of EToys package was not saved and  
> loaded. This should not be. Loading the last EToys package would  
> revert the changes!

By the way, that's a very simple example of why you can't "just load  
the latest packages in the inbox each night". The new versions have  
to be integrated well, particularly, in the more complex cases when  
some bootstrapping is needed.

Adrian