'dirty' Etoys package in 6704?

[stéphane ducasse]

On 9 déc. 05, at 09:10, Cees De Groot wrote:

> On 12/8/05, Adrian Lienhard <adi at netstyle.ch> wrote:
>> By the way, that's a very simple example of why you can't "just load
>> the latest packages in the inbox each night". The new versions have
>> to be integrated well, particularly, in the more complex cases when
>> some bootstrapping is needed.
>>
> Well, fix the tools, then. I mean, if we need handwork between a team
> submitting a fully-integrated package from their clean development
> image and that package being integrated with a bunch of other changes
> in basically the same image causes reasons for manual labor all the
> time, there's something not allright with the tools. Or with the
> submissions, of course ;) (like the team not submitting a consistent
> set of packages).

Indeed but we do not have time for that.
This is why we need help there.
This is why I already said that but nobody listen.
This is why I will stop in the future.

Simple.

Stef