[V3dot9] Re: About condenseChanges and Traits

[Pavel Krivanek]

Hi Stef,

there were some corrupted methods in the 7054 after condenseSources.
The test showed that the problem with the same methods is before
condesneSources, in version 7053 after evaluation of condenseChanges.
The test worked well in some version before, I don't know the exact
version and I wasn't doing this test by myself.

-- Pavel

On 8/23/06, stéphane ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> Hi pavel
>
> I'm confused:
>
>
> In your email
>
> "
> Corrupted condenseChanges again in 7053 (was "[ANN] Squeak3.9g-7054...")
> Hi all,
> it seems that the problem with corrupted sources Squeak3.9g-7054 in
> has the source in corrupted condenseChanges in 7053. This is the
> result of the condenseChanges test:
> "
> You seems to implied that condenseChanges was the problem in 7053.
> Now you are saying the inverse.
> I will redo the experience but I would like somebody else to help.
> So now you are saying that the tests are ok in 7053?
>
> Stef
>
> > Yes, I have taken the 7053 image
> > an http://mail.google.com/mail/?account_id=pavel.krivanek%40gmail.comd
> > evaluated the testing code that stores all souces into the dictionary,
> > condense changes and then test if the sources are still the same. One
> > small problem is that the image must be saved and reopened after
> > condensing of changes because condenseChanges doesn't do correct
> > reopening of the changes file with the right encoding.
> >
> > AFAIK this test was working well. Maybe we should test previous images
> > to see where it stoped work well. Maybe is problem only with the
> > method category name of broken methods because, as far as I remember,
> > it contains space character.
> >
> > -- Pavel
> >
>
>