[V3dot9] Closing bugzilla reports when harvesting?

[Ken Causey]

On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 17:38 +0200, Marcus Denker wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> Maybe for clearification: I think I got something wrong: The "resolved"
> items on mantis will be closed when merging the package into
> the image. But they don't trigger the merge itself, as the harverstes
> of the package might want to resolve multiple bugs without triggering
> inclusion of each and every step. So the team needs to trigger the
> harversters.

No, I did not understand that.  I assumed, and I think the rest of us
did as well, that the release team would periodically check the Mantis
for issues marked as Resolved and act appropriately and that for the
Steward Team marking the issue Resolved was the final step.  So you are
saying that not only should we mark the issue but we should also send a
notice that the issue is ready for harvesting to the v3dot9 list?

> I should stop to answer any harvesting related mails, I am not
> "in the flow" anymore, and I can't do anything anyway.

I understand, I'll be interested to hear from Stef.

>      Marcus

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/v3dot9/attachments/20060525/9c7ca101/attachment.pgp