[Vm-dev] [Pharo-project] Plan/discussion/communication around new
Andreas.Raab at gmx.de
Fri Jun 15 08:48:55 UTC 2012
> Remember, what i have been told when i implemented a language-side
> scheduling, removing the
> need of VM to even know that is Semaphore?
> I been told *it is slow*. And this was the *only* argument against it,
> why it is found unacceptable.
I think you might be misremembering. IIRC, the real argument was the risk
(albeit expressed as performance concerns) of replacing VM-level scheduling
by image-level scheduling without further ado. I don't recall that anyone
had an objection to image-level scheduling as an option in addition to
VM-level scheduling. In which case one can experiment with the implications
and learn from the change in the environment without necessarily committing
the production systems to an unproven feature.
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Vm-dev