[Vm-dev] reorganizing opensmalltalk-vm
Tobias Pape
Das.Linux at gmx.de
Sun Oct 28 20:52:58 UTC 2018
> On 28.10.2018, at 20:52, tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On 2018-10-28, at 12:37 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> The only thing I'd like to see in Tonel is per-method timestamps a la
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> but I know there is active opposition to this idea.
>
> Why on earth is there any opposition to what appears a perfectly reasonable idea? Within, of course, the context of an idea I find rather daft, that of trying to force Smalltalk source code into a model that seems completely at odds.
I think the reasoning is that the time stamp can trivially reified from the VCS history (ie, git blameā¦)
The data is still there, yet no more completely tied to the code.
Best regards
-Tobias
PS: also, the time stamp format we use up until now is not very portable (in a i18n kind of way)
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list