[Webteam] Re: Mantis projects for www.squeak.org and Squeak 3.8

[Ken Causey]

Thanks, but I don't think you needed to ask us anything.  We are
'janitors', not rulers.  I never meant for us (Janitors Team) to be the
controllers of the Mantis server.  Notification is appreciated though.

Ken

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 08:24 +0100, Marcus Denker wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Michael and I added two Projects on the mantis, and afterwards I  
> remembered that I should
> have asked you both groups before doing that... sorry. We can of  
> course delete them if
> you don't like it.
> 
> 1) Squeak 3.8
> Bugs do get fixed in 3.9, but it's impossible to let the bugs then  
> open in Mantis for beeing
> then maybe fixed in 3.8, too (or not).
> Thus there is now a dedicated Project, where all bugs will be moved  
> that are 3.8 only, and
> where those reports can be copied to that are fixed in 3.9 but would  
> make sense to be
> fixed in 3.8, too.
> 
> 2) squeak.org
> We had a category www.squeak.org for that... but somehow I felt that  
> this deserves it's
> own project. We have over 300 items on mantis for 'Squeak', and it  
> gets kind
> of unmanagable if we don't subdevide, I fear.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
>           Marcus
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://liststest.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/webteam/attachments/20060214/121ece8c/attachment.pgp