RE: [Cryptography Team] RE: Notes for Meeting with lawyers

Ok I added your question to my list of things to discuss.

Ron

-----Original Message----- From: cryptography-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:cryptography-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Chris Muller Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 1:09 PM To: cryptography@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: [Cryptography Team] RE: Notes for Meeting with lawyers

My goals for the meeting are:

1.   Find out how to register and comply with US export regulations
   

regarding Cryptography. ..

Hi Ron, my main question centers around what are the requirements for non-cryptographic software that merely *uses* already-exported cryptographic software?

Specifically, would key-management software? What about if I used our existing Cryptography package to secure Magma? In that case, do they want to be notified about Cryptography, Magma, neither or both?

Where is the boundary on one side of which requires registration and the other side does not?

What you're doing is really going to help us all out, thanks!!

- Chris _______________________________________________ Cryptography mailing list Cryptography@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cryptography