I will try to do the benchmarks also with 3.8 and 3.8.1 later this evening (night :).
But for my amateur eye it was interesting to see the difference with largeExplorers benchmark on my 3 machines - 1:2:3.
On 11/16/06, bryce@kampjes.demon.co.uk bryce@kampjes.demon.co.uk wrote:
One more question. How safe is it to stick with the exupery vm for my non-exupery-loaded images?
Loading Exupery from SqueakMap is perfectly safe. The main reason I provide the pre-build VMs is to make it easier to get started. They are also a useful basis for macro benchmarks as the code behind the benchmark will be the same.
I suspect that some of the differences with largeExplorer performance was due to image differences. I benchmarked using 3.8, Andy used 3.8.1, and Jakub used the pre-built 3.9.
Bryce _______________________________________________ Exupery mailing list Exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery