Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:57:08 +0300> From: siguctua@gmail.com> To: exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org> Subject: Asm-Generator - integration with Compiler> > To indicate that currently submitted method is assembler, developer> just need to put> <assembler> pragma in code.> I will place some 'awful hacks' in Compiler to react on this pragma> and redirect all further processing to my classes.Alternatively, you can just add a class side method (#compilerClass I think it is) that tells Smalltalk to use what ever class you want when it tries to compile methods for the class. This might be better "self documenting" for people reading the code that aren't familiar with what <assembler> might mean and wouldn't know where too look. But if they see compilerClass then they know exactly what class to look at to see what's going on.
_________________________________________________________________ Local listings, incredible imagery, and driving directions - all in one place! Find it! http://maps.live.com/?wip=69&FORM=MGAC01
On 22/07/07, J J azreal1977@hotmail.com wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:57:08 +0300 From: siguctua@gmail.com To: exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Asm-Generator - integration with Compiler
To indicate that currently submitted method is assembler, developer just need to put <assembler> pragma in code. I will place some 'awful hacks' in Compiler to react on this pragma and redirect all further processing to my classes.
Alternatively, you can just add a class side method (#compilerClass I think it is) that tells Smalltalk to use what ever class you want when it tries to compile methods for the class. This might be better "self documenting" for people reading the code that aren't familiar with what <assembler> might mean and wouldn't know where too look. But if they see compilerClass then they know exactly what class to look at to see what's going on.
Its already done as you said :) I have a trait with couple of methods, which , when you use it in your class, then all instance side methods can be potentially treated as assembler.
Local listings, incredible imagery, and driving directions - all in one place! Find it! _______________________________________________ Exupery mailing list Exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:11:51 +0200, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 22/07/07, J J azreal1977@hotmail.com wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:57:08 +0300 From: siguctua@gmail.com To: exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Asm-Generator - integration with Compiler
To indicate that currently submitted method is assembler, developer just need to put <assembler> pragma in code. I will place some 'awful hacks' in Compiler to react on this pragma and redirect all further processing to my classes.
Alternatively, you can just add a class side method (#compilerClass I think it is) that tells Smalltalk to use what ever class you want when it tries to compile methods for the class. This might be better "self documenting" for people reading the code that aren't familiar with what <assembler> might mean and wouldn't know where too look. But if they see compilerClass then they know exactly what class to look at to see what's going on.
Its already done as you said :) I have a trait with couple of methods, which , when you use it in your class, then all instance side methods can be potentially treated as assembler.
Ahh, putting software composition at work :) can't wait for seeing this in action :)
Exupery mailing list Exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery
You can also visit my blog http://computeradvenrutes.blogspot.com/ where i lazily write so details. I putting notes in blog mainly because i don't want something important being lost in mailing lists. It also helpful for newcomers to quickly get in topic :)
On 23/07/07, Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel@cobss.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:11:51 +0200, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 22/07/07, J J azreal1977@hotmail.com wrote:
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:57:08 +0300 From: siguctua@gmail.com To: exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Asm-Generator - integration with Compiler
To indicate that currently submitted method is assembler, developer just need to put <assembler> pragma in code. I will place some 'awful hacks' in Compiler to react on this pragma and redirect all further processing to my classes.
Alternatively, you can just add a class side method (#compilerClass I think it is) that tells Smalltalk to use what ever class you want when it tries to compile methods for the class. This might be better "self documenting" for people reading the code that aren't familiar with what <assembler> might mean and wouldn't know where too look. But if they see compilerClass then they know exactly what class to look at to see what's going on.
Its already done as you said :) I have a trait with couple of methods, which , when you use it in your class, then all instance side methods can be potentially treated as assembler.
Ahh, putting software composition at work :) can't wait for seeing this in action :)
Exupery mailing list Exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery
Exupery mailing list Exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery
exupery@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Igor Stasenko -
J J -
Klaus D. Witzel