If you come up with an idea that works well, please let everyone know, thanks..
----- Original Message ---- From: "goran@krampe.se" goran@krampe.se To: magma@lists.squeakfoundation.org Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 4:14:52 AM Subject: Re: Bugfix and a Query question
Hi!
Chris Muller chris@funkyobjects.org wrote:
On to my question - is it planned that where: queries could also operate on attributes that are not indexed?
It's not planned at this time. As much as I would like to have that, I know no way to do it, given the robust api. The select: requires a block executed on the client (because domain classes are not present on the server), so even simple #size and #at: is impossible.
Ok, then I know!
I ask mainly because then I will go ahead and split my Gjallar filtering into two steps - first use Magma #where: and then follow that up with a regular select: (or actually - on demand testing probably - as the user views the "next 10" hits, if Magma returns more than say 100 hits).
regards, Göran _______________________________________________ Magma mailing list Magma@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
magma@lists.squeakfoundation.org