Hi Lex!
"Lex Spoon" lex@cc.gatech.edu wrote:
goran.krampe@bluefish.se wrote:
- Universes. I intend to look into Lex's code again more carefully and
try to figure out how to either: a) Make it work "with" SM. But this is only interesting if Lex or someone else wants to continue maintaining Universes and nor merging it with SM. b) Merge the concepts and mechanisms with SM so that the sum is greater than the parts.
For the record, Universes is under maintenance and in use, and (no surprise) it achieves all of the properties I mentioned in my opening email.
(btw, it should be "not" and not "nor" above under a))
Ok, so what is your view on this then? Am I to interpret you that you wish me to go for a) ? Meaning integration instead of merge of concepts?
I do have an idea that we could add "Universe" as a new "type" of thing on SM, just as I would like to add "image" as another type, and possibly even "repository" (Monticello).
I want to work for us to end up in the best of worlds - and I need you to work with me here.
regards, Göran