how can I try?
Bryce Kampjes
bryce at kampjes.demon.co.uk
Sat Nov 5 13:49:17 CET 2005
Chris Muller writes:
> Congratulations Bryce on this great work (in progress), and thanks too. The
> idea of a significant speed increase "for free" is very exciting to me. After
> reading the pages at http://www.kampjes.demon.co.uk/ it's evident the
> complexity involved to achieve this is staggering.
I've moved most of my current documentation over to the swiki. The
stuff on my homepage is rather dated now.
http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/Exupery
There's instruction on both building using a premade VM and from
source.
> I would like to get a whiff of it; I have some indexing stuff that spends most
> of its time doing Integer (including LargePositiveInteger) arithmetic,
> encapsulated into four or five methods. I am very curious to run my test case
> in an Exupery-loaded image.
If you tell me how to run the test easily in a profiler I could
have a look.
> Does it work in Windoze at the moment? Sorry, I did not find install /
> operational details on the site. I did load the SqueakSource version 113 but
> did not see any improvement in 0 tinyBenchmarks so I didn't bother with my
> indexing test..
Exupery only works on Linux/x86 at the moment. However a Windows
port should be fairly easy. With luck it would just involve building
an Exupery VM for windows. Without luck it would involve dealing
with a different C calling convention. Either way it should be the
one of the easiest ports. Any volunteers?
Using the latest from SqueakSource is very sensible but it will
require building a VM from source. I could throw a current prebuilt
VM up on the web though. Could you try this on Linux?
Bryce
More information about the Exupery
mailing list