[Seaside-dev] path parameters in WAUrl?

Philippe Marschall philippe.marschall at gmail.com
Fri Jul 8 10:15:05 UTC 2011


2011/7/8 Julian Fitzell <jfitzell at gmail.com>:
> Hmm... I haven't actually gone and looked at the code, but conceptually I'm
> not totally convinced that should be part of WAUrl (after all, people could
> use many syntax forms within path segments).

If it's not part of WAUrl then it gets quite hard to support this. It
gets passed to the application as part of the request URL, it get
rendered on the document as part of the actions URL.

> As you said, the spec says
> nothing about the meaning of the path;

The spec explicitly mentions that applications (can) do that.

> would it be more logical to have
> something you can use to parse/generate such URLs?

IMHO it would be logical to have in in WAUrl.

Cheers
Philippe


More information about the seaside-dev mailing list