[Seaside] The best combination of stuff for SeaSide?

[Yoshiki.Ohshima at acm.org]

  Stephen,

  Thank you for the suggestion.  I'm not going to need any fancy
features for short term, and try to minimize the change to Commanche
or Seaside as little as possible (although I'm anticipating that
Japanization will require some change.)  The version difference
shouldn't matter too much, I think.  If you think that 6.1 is
"beta"-enough, which it seems you do, I think I can go ahead with 6.1
and applying patches from you later on.  A problem would be to distill
the "good" patches from the flood of emails...

-- Yoshiki

At Mon, 19 May 2003 12:20:49 -0400,
Stephen Pair wrote:
> 
> Avi Bryant wrote:
> 
> >However, if the Seaside app is just one part of a larger collection of
> >things you need your server to do (like serve static files and manage
> >virtual hosts), then there's some nice stuff in Comanche 6.1.  I'm not
> >sure it's there yet in terms of stability (I've seen some quirks in 6.1
> >that weren't there in 5.1) but Stephen is putting a lot of work into it so
> >I'm sure any problems won't last long.
> >
> 
> Yoshiki,
> 
> The more I think about this, the more I'm inclined to encourage you to 
> use Comanche 6.1.  I don't know what quirks Avi is referring to (and I'm 
> sure they can be easily addressed), but 6.1 is more about cleaning up 
> Comanche (as compared with 5.1) than about bells and whistles.  For 
> example, Comanche 5.1 doesn't properly handle Http/1.1 persistent 
> connections, whereas 6.1 does.
> 
> As for stability of the code base, Comanche 6.1 is in Beta, which means 
> that I won't be adding any features to 6.1, only bug fixes.  As for 
> operational stability, the overall architecture of Comanche 6.1 is a lot 
> cleaner, which I believe will yield a much more stable web serving platform.
> 
> - Stephen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/seaside