[Seaside] Re: What do you think about Ruby on Rails ?

[stephane ducasse]

Damien

In CommonLisp good environment you also have an image: the method are  
compiled into byte-code and you
can get the "same" Smalltalk like browser and interface.

Then I have a question. There is no problem you to code in emacs  
Smalltalk code (look at the format of the file you obtain
when you fileout a changeset) and load it when you launch an image.  
You will get a file-based language.
What is the problem of having an image when you save your code with  
monticello.
What I would like to have is a smalltalk scripting language. If you  
are interested this is an exciting topic.

Stef



On 7 août 05, at 13:22, Damien Cassou wrote:


>> I'll admit it, I'm beaten. :-(
>>
>>
>
> We  do  not  fight  :-)  I'm  just  trying  to  understand  why  every
> smalltalkers like this concept of image that much. And if somebody ask
> me, I want to be able to answer because I like Smalltalk very much.
>
>
>
>> I think it's best if somebody else with better "explaining Smalltalk"
>> skills takes over.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Damien Cassou
>   pour le Software Composition Group a Berne
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/seaside
>
>
>