[Seaside] Bootstrap implementations, pros and cons?

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Thu Feb 20 17:42:59 UTC 2014


On 20.02.2014, at 17:24, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm migrating from Gaston's Twitter Bootstrap [1] implementation to
> the one referenced by QCMagritte [2], but when trying to migrate a few
> tbAlert references I found that [2] uses a completely different
> approach than [1] and also Torsten's version [3].
> 
> Torsten's version seem to be more organized, and documented. The
> examples are better too.
> 
> Besides that difference in the use of Decorations for alerts, they do
> basically the same thing. Do QCMagritte use [2] for a particular
> reason?
> 

[2] is aimed at Magritte specifically, which Torsten left out in [3]
for good reasons. 

Best
	-Tobias

> Loading the configuration of [3] forces the load of Seaside 3.1.0
> configuration, which is okay as far as you're using it.
> 
> Regards!
> 
> 
> 
> Refs:
> [1] http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~GastonDallOglio/TBootstrap
> [2] http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/TwitterBootstrap.html
> [3] http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~TorstenBergmann/Bootstrap
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Esteban A. Maringolo
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1625 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20140220/d52ac4d5/signature.pgp


More information about the seaside mailing list